Court Delivers Judgment in NDLEA’s Case Against Abba Kyari
The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, fixed Feb. 26, 2026, for judgment in a case filed by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) against suspended DCP Abba Kyari.
The NDLEA is prosecuting Kyari, the former head of Police Intelligence Response Team (IRT), and his two younger brothers on allegations bordering on non-disclosure of assets.
Justice James Omotosho fixed the date after counsel for the NDLEA, Sunday Joseph; Kyari’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, and his brothers’ counsel, Monjok Agom, adopted their processes and presented their arguments for and against the charge.
The NDLEA, in the 23-count charge, named Abba Kyari, Mohammed Kyari and Ali Kyari as 1st to 3rd defendants respectively.
The anti-narcotics agency alleged that Abba and his two younger brothers; Mohammed and Ali, failed to make full disclosure of their assets.
It said it uncovered 14 assets, including shopping malls, residential estate, polo playground, lands and farmland belonging to Kyari.
Kyari was alleged to have failed to disclose his ownership of the property in different locations in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja and Maiduguri in Borno.
The NDLEA alleged that over N207 million and Є17, 598 were also discovered in Kyari’s various accounts in Guarantee Trust Bank, United Bank for Africa and Sterling Bank.
The agency, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/408/2022, also accused them of “disguising of ownership of properties and conversion of monies.”
The NDLEA said the offences are punishable under Section 35 (3) (a) of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act, and Section 15 (3) (a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011.
They however pleaded not guilty to all the counts. The NDLEA called 10 witnesses to prove their case and tendered at least 20 exhibits. Kyari, however, elected to make a no-case submission after the prosecution closed its case.
The former IRT leader, through his lawyer, argued that the prosecution had failed to provide evidence showing indeed that he was the owner of the said property.
But Justice Omotosho, on Oct. 28, dismissed the no-case submission on the ground that the prosecution had been able to establish a prima facie case against the defendants, hence, the need to open his defence to clarify some of the issues.
Kyari, who opened his defence on Nov. 4, insisted that he declared his assets and that of his wife in line with the law. Besides, he denied ownership of some of the assets linked to him by the NDLEA.
He clarified that some of the property listed by the prosecution belonged to his late father, who had about 30 children.
He also refuted the allegations that he owned the polo playground in Borno, saying he was surprised that the large expanse of land would be linked to him.
NAN reports that Kyari, on Nov. 26, closed his defence after he concluded his evidence led by Ikpeazu and was cross-examined by the NDLEA lawyer.
However Kyari’s two brothers (Mohammed and Ali), through their lawyer, Monjok Agom, told the court that they would not be calling any witness. According to the lawyer, we shall be resting our case on that of the prosecution’s case.
The instant case is different from the cocaine deal trial he is undergoing alongside some police officers before Justice Emeka Nwite of a sister court at the Federal High Court in Abuja. However, both cases were instituted by the NDLEA in 2022. #Court Delivers Judgment in NDLEA’s Case Against Abba Kyari#
